We Want to Hear From Canada Letter Readers
This week I returned from a uncommon (for me) journey to The Times’s head workplace in Manhattan. One of the issues that repeatedly got here up throughout my conferences with editors is this article. They had been very eager to know what you, its readers, wish to see in it and what you wish to see about Canada typically within the report — what we used to name the newspaper.
So, for this week, the Canada Letter will flip its gaze inward.
This e-newsletter, beneath the identify Canada Today, debuted in 2016, proper across the time of my earlier journey to the New York workplace. It was a part of a push by The Times to draw extra readers in Canada.
The effort included, amongst different issues, including two extra correspondents who joined me after a decade of overlaying Canada solo. Now there are 4 of us overlaying Canada — me, Dan Bilefsky, Norimitsu Onishi and Vjosa Isai, our reporter-researcher who now writes the Canada Letter as soon as a month.
Every week, a lot of you’re taking the time to e-mail us along with your compliments, feedback, complaints and ideas for the e-newsletter. Those notes have been very useful in guiding its evolution. (And, whereas my schedule typically makes it troublesome to reply, each one among your emails is certainly learn, usually by a number of folks.)
In these emails I’ve typically discovered a little bit of confusion between the e-newsletter and The New York Times usually. So it could be helpful to put out what we’re doing right here and the place we’d be capable to go.
Above all, the e-newsletter isn’t our news report on Canada. That seems on nytimes.com, on the New York Times cell app and within the print version of the paper. In the Trans Canada part of the e-newsletter, we share hyperlinks to the total Canada report every week, in case you missed one thing.
Another factor that units the e-newsletter aside from The New York Times’s news report is that the e-newsletter is meant particularly for Canadian readers. As a end result, the editors give me and Vjosa some leeway, for instance, in omitting background info on points and other people acquainted to Canadians and in some type variations like not together with the province after the names of bigger cities. Many of you have got informed me that you really want Canadian spellings as nicely, a request I’m sharing with my editors. We at present adhere to The Times’s type information, as the opposite worldwide newsletters do.
We hold the e-newsletter quick and keep away from utilizing it for in-depth investigations and deep evaluation as a result of few folks love lengthy emails.
But from the beginning of the Canada Letter I’ve tried to not prohibit what it may be. In phrases of content material, my mannequin for it has been the lengthy gone CBC Radio program “Morningside” when it was hosted by Peter Gzowski, the journalist and writer who died in 2002. (My apologies to youthful readers for whom that is in all probability meaningless.)
Its mixture of matters was extremely eclectic. The present’s weekly political panel had no equal in Canadian media on the time. It blended enjoyable and typically weird parts —most famously Stuart McLean’s look with a “sleeping” cricket that he had simply bought.
Here I wouldn’t go fairly that far. I do know from emails that a few of you would favor that we persist with severe news and evaluation each week. But a number of of the most well-liked Canada Letters have been about issues like Canadian junk meals.
I apologize that we’re not capable of report or write a e-newsletter that includes each province or area each week. Our aim is to be the authorities on what’s newsworthy to our world viewers. We purpose to supply as extensive a report as potential with out compromising the signature New York Times depth that readers count on.
We have all the time been dedicated to overlaying all of Canada in its entirety, and we recurrently report outdoors the inhabitants facilities of Ontario and Quebec. I felt like a part-time resident of Alberta final 12 months, Dan has not too long ago returned from reporting a number of articles in British Columbia, and Nori reported within the far north.
Before I ship editors my follow-up memos from my New York tour, I’m hoping that a few of you’ll let me know what you need, and would fairly keep away from seeing, within the Canada Letter. Please ship your ideas to nytcanada@nytimes.com. Thanks to the various of you who’ve been loyal readers and commenters over the previous few years, and a heat welcome to these of you who’ve only recently discovered the e-newsletter.
Trans Canada
-
An invention of the Mounties, “Mr. Big” schemes are primarily con jobs by which undercover officers create a pretend prison enterprise after which entice a goal to affix it, with the purpose of getting them to admit to earlier crimes. Vjosa Isai, my Toronto-based colleague, studies that the Mounties declare a 95 p.c conviction success price for the tactic, however critics say that it’s a breeding floor for false convictions.
-
As Ukraine is predicted to start a counteroffensive towards Russian forces, Canada pledged to supply it with further army help throughout a go to by Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal of Ukraine to Toronto this week.
-
Since 2020, the Toronto Blue Jays have been the nomads of Major League Baseball. That’s lastly nearing its finish.
-
The president and the board members of the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation stop this week, saying that accusations of Chinese meddling in its affairs had made it not possible for it to operate as earlier than.
-
The Styles desk has ready a information to the coronation of King Charles III.
A local of Windsor, Ontario, Ian Austen was educated in Toronto, lives in Ottawa and has reported about Canada for The New York Times for the previous 16 years. Follow him on Twitter at @ianrausten.
How are we doing?
We’re wanting to have your ideas about this article and occasions in Canada usually. Please ship them to nytcanada@nytimes.com.
Like this e-mail?
Forward it to your pals, and allow them to know they will join right here.
Source web site: www.nytimes.com