Who’s Who within the Google Monopoly Trial

A trial to find out if Google abused its monopoly in on-line search, which begins on Tuesday, is about to put naked how the web search large cemented its energy, that includes testimony from high tech executives, engineers, economists and teachers.

The trial will unfold in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the place a core group of people will command the courtroom and direct the day-to-day authorized methods. Here are the important thing folks to know in U.S. et al. v. Google:

From federal court docket

Judge Amit P. Mehta

Judge Mehta, who was appointed to the bench in 2014 by President Barack Obama, will referee and determine the case within the nonjury trial.

In greater than three years of pretrial hearings, Judge Mehta hasn’t tipped his hand on his views of the case. In a continuing final month, he narrowed the lawsuit by the Justice Department and states whereas preserving the core argument that Google maintained its monopoly in search by way of offers with smartphone makers that minimize out rivals.

Judge Mehta, 52, was randomly assigned to U.S. et al. v. Google. He could also be extra acquainted with Google than different federal judges, whose common age reached 69 in 2020, in accordance with a research on the time by The Ohio State Law Journal. He obtained his legislation diploma from the University of Virginia in 1997, a yr earlier than Larry Page and Sergey Brin based Google.

Judge Mehta beforehand labored in personal observe in San Francisco and Washington, specializing in white-collar felony protection, advanced enterprise disputes and appellate advocacy.

For the plaintiffs

Jonathan Kanter, assistant lawyer basic for antitrust on the Justice Department

Mr. Kanter, the highest antitrust official on the Justice Department, is overseeing the federal government’s case.

President Biden appointed Mr. Kanter, a longtime tech and media lawyer who obtained his legislation diploma from Washington University in St. Louis, to the Justice Department in July 2021. Mr. Kanter is amongst a bunch of progressive Big Tech critics whom Mr. Biden has positioned in high authorities positions for antitrust enforcement. He inherited the Google case from the Trump administration.

Mr. Kanter, 50, can also be overseeing a separate antitrust lawsuit towards Google within the advert tech market. Google has raised considerations that his historical past of representing its rivals, together with Microsoft and News Corp, makes him biased, and the corporate has protested his involvement within the advert tech case.

It’s unclear how typically Mr. Kanter will seem in court docket. Doha Mekki, the Justice Department’s principal deputy assistant lawyer basic, and Hetal Doshi, the deputy assistant lawyer basic for antitrust, have helped quarterback the lawsuit and will likely be within the courtroom each day.

Kenneth Dintzer, a deputy director within the civil division of the Justice Department

Mr. Dintzer, a 30-year veteran of the Justice Department, will give opening statements and is main the federal government’s case within the courtroom.

A graduate of the University of Michigan legislation college, Mr. Dintzer, 59, was assigned to the Google case in the course of the Trump administration. He has argued in pretrial hearings earlier than Judge Mehta that Google destroyed on the spot messages “depriving” the division “of a rich source of candid discussions between Google’s executives, including likely trial witnesses.”

He has labored on antitrust circumstances up to now, together with the Justice Department’s lawsuit to dam AT&T’s proposed merger with T-Mobile in 2011. The firms ultimately dropped the deal.

Mr. Weiser is overseeing a coalition of 38 state and different attorneys generals that joined the Justice Department in its search lawsuit.

Mr. Weiser, 55, a former deputy assistant lawyer basic of antitrust on the Justice Department for the Obama administration, has been a vocal critic of massive tech firms for stifling competitors. After graduating from New York University Law School, he grew to become a counsel to Joel Klein, the Justice Department’s head of antitrust in the course of the company’s Microsoft monopoly lawsuit within the Nineteen Nineties. He didn’t work instantly on the case however mentioned in an interview that it had influenced him.

Mr. Weiser has picked Jonathan Sallet, a former deputy head of antitrust on the Justice Department, and William Cavanaugh, a lawyer at Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler and a former Justice Department official, because the lead litigators for the states.

For the protection

Sundar Pichai, Google’s chief government

Mr. Pichai, the chief government of Google, is extensively anticipated to testify in the course of the trial.

He joined Google in 2004 as a product administration chief of Chrome and different instruments, and was named chief government in August 2015.

A measured and calm speaker who has at occasions been known as boring, Mr. Pichai, 51, was largely unruffled when testifying in congressional hearings over content material moderation and antitrust lately. That might serve him properly within the trial.

Google’s founders, Mr. Page and Mr. Brin, aren’t anticipated to be known as as witnesses. But the Justice Department and Google are more likely to name different tech executives to testify, together with Eddy Cue, Apple’s senior vice chairman of providers, to debate the corporate’s search offers with Google.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of worldwide affairs

Mr. Walker, Google’s president of worldwide affairs and chief authorized counsel, is overseeing the corporate’s protection.

Mr. Walker, 62, obtained his legislation diploma from Stanford and joined Google in 2006. He led Google’s coverage and authorized technique by way of an antitrust investigation by the Federal Trade Commission that started in 2009. The company determined to not proceed with a lawsuit after the corporate agreed to some modifications.

Mr. Walker is overseeing an enormous workforce of in-house and outdoors attorneys and will likely be out and in of the courtroom. Google’s each day authorized consultant within the courtroom, who has supervised technique on the case, is Lara Kollios, a director in regulatory response and investigations.

John E. Schmidtlein, associate at Williams & Connolly

Mr. Schmidtlein, a co-chair of antitrust at Williams & Connolly, is Google’s lead lawyer within the courtroom.

Google has turned to attorneys like Mr. Schmidtlein, 57, who fought towards Microsoft in antitrust circumstances twenty years in the past, to defend it in court docket. In 2002, Mr. Schmidtlein represented states that sued Microsoft for utilizing its dominance in Windows software program to dam rival media gamers.

Mr. Schmidtlein, who obtained his legislation diploma from Georgetown University, additionally has a protracted observe report working for tech firms. This yr, he helped Amazon defeat an antitrust lawsuit that customers introduced towards its logistics practices.

Google’s litigation workforce additionally contains Susan Creighton, a associate at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati who represented Netscape within the authorities’s 1998 antitrust swimsuit towards Microsoft, and Mark Popofsky, a associate at Ropes & Gray who was a senior counsel to the Justice Department in that swimsuit towards Microsoft.