Jack Dorsey criticises Musk on Twitter deal: ‘It all went south’

Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey — as soon as a supporter of Elon Musk’s $44 billion acquisition of the positioning — is now providing sharp criticism of the brand new proprietor and his dealing with of the deal.

Asked if Musk has confirmed himself to be the very best steward for the platform, Dorsey mentioned, “No. Nor do I think he acted right after realizing his timing was bad. Nor do I think the board should have forced the sale.”

After inventory markets turned shortly following his supply to purchase Twitter a 12 months in the past, Musk sought to withdraw from the deal. That prompted a authorized battle between the corporate and the billionaire, earlier than the acquisition was accomplished at its authentic supply worth.

“It all went south,” Dorsey wrote on Bluesky, the invite-only Twitter various that he’s backing. (ALSO READ: Why Jack Dorsey’s Bluesky shouldn’t be merely a Twitter clone: Real distinction is…)

Twitter didn’t particularly reply to a request for remark.

Dorsey, who was pleasant with Musk for years and prompt he get entangled with Twitter, was beforehand publicly in favor of the deal. Last 12 months, he referred to as Musk as proprietor of Twitter “the singular solution I trust.”

On Friday, one Bluesky consumer mentioned it was fairly unhappy the way it all went down, to which Dorsey replied “yes.” But Twitter “would have never survived as a public company,” he added in one other publish. “Would you rather have had it owned by hedge funds and Wall Street activists? That was the only alternative.”

Under Musk, who took over in late October, Twitter lower a majority of its employees and endured a variety of public crises, together with over its plan for verifying customers. Musk has been pitching a subscription service for Twitter during which customers can receive a blue verify mark for $8 a month.

“Payment as proof of human is a trap and I’m not aligned with that at all,” Dorsey mentioned on Bluesky. “The payment systems being used for that proof exclude millions if not billions of people.”