The listening to of a case involving 84 folks charged with establishing and managing a terrorist organisation within the UAE, has been adjourned to April 18.
The Abu Dhabi Federal Appeals Court adjourned the case with a view to full listening to the defence pleas.
The 84 defendants face prices of planning terrorist acts, fundraising for the ‘Justice and Dignity Committee’ terrorist organisation, and concealing the supply and vacation spot of these funds.
During the session held on Friday, which was attended by the defendants’ households and media representatives, the courtroom heard over three and a half hours of defence arguments.
The legal professionals for the accused challenged the validity of the fees offered by the Prosecution and contested the proof submitted, together with the investigations and technical and monetary experiences.
They argued that these experiences relied closely on evaluation, leaving room for doubt and uncertainty, and demanded the acquittal and launch of their purchasers, noting to the absence of legal intent because of their purchasers’ lack of know-how of the organisation’s true intentions.
The defence additionally argued that the courtroom lacked jurisdiction because of a previous judgment in a earlier case, i.e. Case No. 79 of 2012. This shaped a basic facet of their defence technique, which all defendants endorsed.
It is noteworthy that the Public Prosecution devoted a part of its earlier classes to addressing the argument for lack of jurisprudence.
They highlighted distinctions between the present case and previous trials involving the defendants, supported by proof.
The Prosecution additional strengthened its argument by outlining the standards governing software to dismissing a case because of a previous judgment.
They additionally cited particular rulings from the Federal Supreme Court to help their place.
