Homeless Advocate Takes on A.C.L.U., and It’s Personal

On the final Thursday of August, Jennifer Livovich spent the morning simmering beans and cheese sauce in her Boulder, Colo., condo, making ready nachos. Then pals helped her load a truck with the meals, together with donations she had secured — socks, toothbrushes, cellphones — to distribute at a downtown park the place dozens of chronically homeless folks congregate.

“Hopefully, no drama,” she stated because the truck pulled away.

Ms. Livovich has grow to be a central determine in Boulder’s efforts to assist the homeless. In 2020, she created a nonprofit, Feet Forward, to serve a number of hundred folks whom the county estimates lack everlasting shelter. And she recurrently consults with, and is consulted by, policymakers, housing officers and the Boulder County district legal professional. In late November she wrote an op-ed in a neighborhood paper on homelessness and substance use. To these conversations, she brings an intimate experience: For 5 years, from 2012 to 2017, she lived on the streets of Boulder, usually inebriated, till a brush with frostbite scared her into remedy.

“She struck a chord in Boulder that I’ve not ever seen before,” stated Benita Duran, a former Boulder assistant metropolis supervisor.

In 2021, the American Civil Liberties Union requested Ms. Livovich and Feet Forward to hitch as plaintiffs in a lawsuit that may drive town to reform its homeless insurance policies. She was instructed that the lawsuit was “going to change homeless lives,” she recalled. “So of course I joined.”

Lawsuits like this one are more and more widespread across the nation, as cities grapple with stubbornly power homeless populations and a vexing authorized and ethical query: Can an individual be given a ticket for sleeping in a public space? Or, because the A.C.L.U. contends, does such a coverage represent “cruel and unusual punishment” when there are usually not sufficient shelter beds to accommodate everybody in want?

The concern in Boulder grew to become additional fraught in May, when Ms. Livovich instructed the A.C.L.U. that she was withdrawing from the lawsuit. In an interview, she stated that she had signed on as a plaintiff with out totally understanding the case being made — and that she now feels that the A.C.L.U. and its supporters finally don’t perceive the people who they’re making an attempt to assist.

Ms. Livovich argued that many individuals who collect and sometimes sleep round Boulder’s downtown park signify a selected subset of “the homeless.” For them, she stated, the first downside is substance abuse; low-cost, potent medication are so available that the “housing first” coverage oversimplifies the difficulty. Treatment ought to be the primary precedence and, whereas Ms. Livovich doesn’t favor ticketing folks sleeping outdoors, she stated that some folks may should be faraway from the park for his or her security, and that of the general public.

“I’m not anti-housing first,” she stated. “I’m not anti-housing.” But in a world of constrained assets, she added, the spending priorities should be shifted to place higher emphasis on remedy. “There is a growing subset struggling with addiction, and I have a hard time just giving them an apartment,” she stated. “That’s not going to solve their problems.”

“They need treatment,” Ms. Livovich stated. “Every dollar not spent on treatment is a dollar wasted.”

The A.C.L.U., she added, “is looking at this through the lens of what is constitutional and not what is happening on the street.”

Tim Macdonald, the authorized director for the A.C.L.U. of Colorado, countered that the lawsuit sought to fight what he referred to as the “criminalization” of sleeping in public areas with out an alternate. Treatment was necessary, too, he stated, and housing and remedy weren’t mutually unique. He declined to touch upon what the A.C.L.U. stated to Ms. Livovich when she joined the lawsuit, citing attorney-client privilege.

“Our focus is to protect the constitutional rights of the plaintiffs we still represent in this case, and continue our efforts to end the criminalization of people who are unhoused in Boulder,” Mr. Macdonald stated.

He added that Ms. Livovich was necessary initially on the outset however her choice to withdraw doesn’t finish the claims of different plaintiffs. Among them is Feet Forward, the nonprofit that Ms. Livovich based. After she introduced her withdrawal from the swimsuit, she requested her board of administrators to do the identical. But it declined and the nonprofit stayed on as a plaintiff, and Ms. Livovich resigned from her personal group.

“They hijacked my nonprofit for this lawsuit,” she stated of the A.C.L.U. and its allies on the Feet Forward board. “I was played.”

‘This is my park’

At the park, Ms. Livovich, 51, and her staff set tables underneath a big tree and started distributing the tortilla chips, cheese, jalapeños and different fixings.

Wearing a T-shirt bearing the phrases “Be Kind,” she jovially greeted pals she knew from her avenue days as she handed out provides to the hundred or so folks ready in line. A 54-year-old girl who gave her identify as Julie clutched new socks and a muffin as she described how she had simply been launched from the hospital after being handled for pneumonia. An argument amongst a number of males rose in quantity from someplace close by.

In its lawsuit, the A.C.L.U. contends that “homelessness in the region is generally the result of economic conditions,” and that Boulder should first present enough housing earlier than enacting “cover bans” and issuing citations for sleeping in public areas underneath blankets and different types of cowl. It characterizes the ticketing as “cruel and unusual punishment.”

Boulder has countered that its police division has discretion over folks sleeping in public locations. In a number of early judgments, a district decide agreed with town {that a} tent ban doesn’t violate the state structure however stated authorized arguments might proceed on the query of whether or not folks could possibly be cited for sleeping with a blanket or different protecting. A trial date is ready for August.

“There is no sobriety in the park,” Ms. Livovich stated, wanting round. Many of the individuals who collect there are desperately addicted, making an attempt to stave off withdrawal, and generally violent and psychotic. Ms. Livovich stated that the A.C.L.U. misunderstood this subset of homeless folks. In Boulder County, one-half of 1 p.c of the inhabitants is homeless however accounts for 10 p.c of felonies in 2018-2019, in accordance with the county district legal professional.

Ms. Livovich has argued for streamlined companies, supervised remedy when crucial and even detaining individuals who current a threat to themselves or others. She stated the lawsuit didn’t prioritize the well-being of people that have been susceptible to dying on a regular basis. “Nobody has constitutional rights when they’re dead,” she stated.

Mr. Macdonald, of the A.C.L.U., famous that among the plaintiffs within the lawsuit had been cited for sleeping outdoors and that their instances “had nothing to do with drug use or illegal behavior.”

The metropolis doesn’t preserve a day by day complete of its homeless inhabitants, with most knowledge collected on the county degree. In January, Boulder County reported 839 individuals who lacked everlasting shelter; round one-half stayed in a shelter and one-quarter have been in transitional housing, leaving 243 folks outdoors. People keep away from shelters for a lot of causes, together with concern of violence or constrained freedom. Drugs play a job, too, in accordance with a metropolis evaluation: “Either the person has self-medicated into a state in which they cannot make a reasoned decision about sheltering, or they do not want to shelter because they cannot actively use the substance while staying at the shelter.”

Kurt Firnhaber, head of Housing and Human Services for town, stated he endorsed “housing first” however that housing alone didn’t resolve the issue for some folks grappling with drug dependancy. “Many individuals struggle to get through the night,” he stated. And shelters weren’t at all times a refuge. One evening this summer time, Mr. Firnhaber stated, a person at a neighborhood shelter “took a chair and started breaking all the glass in the building.”

At the park, as Ms. Livovich’s staff was cleansing up, an argument that had been escalating between two males abruptly exploded when the older of the 2 — who was tall, with an extended white beard, and wielded a six-inch knife — started chasing the opposite.

Ms. Livovich shortly realized the trigger: There had been a fentanyl overdose within the park the evening earlier than, and the older man was chasing the supplier he thought was accountable. The police arrived and dispelled the stress. Later, Ms. Livovich stated she was dissatisfied however not shocked by the older man’s try and defend the park from a perceived menace. “When I lived out here,” she stated, “I used to say, ‘This is my park.’”

‘Privilege’ and desperation

Ms. Livovich grew up in Hammond, Ind., her father a monetary govt and mom an administrator in a regulation college. She described her childhood as “privileged.” She attended Indiana University briefly however dropped out.

She married at 35, and the connection was abusive. “Drinking was our common denominator,” Ms. Livovich stated. She left the wedding at age 38, touchdown in South Bend, Ind., the place “my drinking got crazy,” she stated. In 2012, she got here to Boulder.

Her life centered on feeding her alcohol dependancy. “It ruled my every move,” she stated. She usually woke behind King Soopers, a grocery store, after which pooled her money with different ordinary drinkers and designated somebody to go inside and make the acquisition. “All day, every day,” she stated.

People who knew her then described her as charismatic and generally ornery. “There are two sides of Jen — there’s sober Jen and drunk Jen,” stated Brentt Van Wagner, 39, who was homeless for 2 dozen years till not too long ago. When intoxicated, Ms. Livovich was “angry,” he stated. “She puts her foot down a lot. Commanding — we’re going to do this, and we’re going to do it this way.” He added, “She’s a good person. She’s got a good heart.”

From 2014 to 2016, Ms. Livovich obtained 51 citations, spent 266 nights in jail and was “hauled to detox 72 times,” she stated. Some detentions “saved my life,” she stated, as a result of she stopped ingesting for a couple of days.

In December 2016, after a scare from frostbite, she entered sober transitional dwelling, spent 18 months in restoration and enrolled at Colorado State University, the place she earned a bachelor’s diploma in human companies. She was positioned into housing in Boulder by a state voucher program. In October 2018, she began amassing socks to offer to the homeless.

In late 2020 that effort grew into Feet Forward, whose mission expanded to supply meals and different staples. It coordinated with Boulder County to supply clear needles and different hurt discount provides, soliciting gadgets from donors and acquiring a shuttle bus to supply cellular outreach companies.

“She has a wealth of knowledge of working with people in trenches around the homeless,” stated Michael Dougherty, the Boulder County district legal professional, who stated he has had a number of conversations with Ms. Livovich over time.

Her method could possibly be direct. “She’s good at calling everybody out in the room who thinks they know better,” stated Molly East, govt director of Focused Reentry, a nonprofit that helps folks transition from incarceration to society. “Her lived experience is fundamental to solving things.”

A well-recognized story

Last spring, after Ms. Livovich withdrew from the lawsuit, she requested the board of Feet Forward to do the identical. When they declined, she requested the board members to resign in order that she might exchange them. Only one — Ms. Duran, the previous assistant metropolis supervisor — did so.

“Jen kept raising the issue and saying, ‘This isn’t right. I don’t want to be involved,’” Ms. Duran stated. In the tip, Ms. Livovich herself resigned, to comply with her personal “moral compass,” she stated.

Darren O’Connor, a board member, despatched an e mail to Feet Forward volunteers. “The board was saddened to receive this resignation,” he wrote, including, “It was important for Feet Forward to remain as a named plaintiff, as deciding to withdraw would require dismissal of the lawsuit.” Later, Mr. O’Connor stated, the board realized that the lawsuit might have proceeded even when the nonprofit had dropped out.

In August, when Ms. Livovich marshaled provides to offer to the homeless, she did so underneath the aegis of a brand new nonprofit, Street Scape, that she hoped would give her and her staff a platform to proceed serving to.

Ten days later, Ms. Livovich began ingesting. Over the following week, her ingesting was intermittent however constant. She sat in a recliner in her condo sipping 100-proof peppermint schnapps from the bottle or a pitcher, her laptop computer and cigarettes close by.

This was not her first relapse, she stated, however she had been largely sober for 4 years till the troubles began over the lawsuit. “I was so devastated,” she stated. After resigning from Feet Forward, she relapsed badly, went into rehab and acquired sober once more, briefly.

“The one thing that I had is gone,” she stated, her voice slurring, eyes heavy. She had developed a mission and group, and felt it had been taken from her. “I don’t have a place,” she stated.

Friends, together with native officers, checked in to remind her that she performed an important position in the neighborhood. With their assist, Ms. Livovich discovered her method right into a detox program after which began intensive work by Alcoholics Anonymous, aiming to attend 30 conferences in 30 days. Soon she was sober and “fighting for my life,” she stated in a textual content. “Root for me.”

While she was in detox, she overheard soon-to-be-released substance customers on a telephone within the public space desperately calling round to search out placement in long-term clinics however developing empty. She nervous for them. “The moments for recovery are fleeting,” she stated. Some folks might lose motivation. “And where are they going?” she stated. “They’re going back to the park.”

As the weeks glided by, Ms. Livovich struggled to discover a Medicaid-supported therapist and a clinician to prescribe medication for melancholy and anxiousness, and those who may assist scale back her alcohol cravings. She stated there weren’t sufficient remedy choices and he or she couldn’t discover assist. She made it 64 days sober, after which she relapsed once more simply earlier than Thanksgiving. A couple of days after the vacation, she fell in her condo, hit her head and lower the within of her mouth, resulting in an emergency room go to. Friends acquired her again into detox. One of them, a doctor, pulled some strings and acquired her an appointment with a therapist and a clinician in the course of the first week of December.

“Look at how difficult it has been for me to get treatment, and I’m relatively well connected,” Ms. Livovich stated. “Imagine what it looks like for somebody who knows nobody but other guys that are getting high in the park.”